Choices for Patients “Without a Choice”
Interviews With Patients Who Received a Left Ventricular Assist Device as Destination Therapy
- Abigale L. Ottenberg, MA,
- Katlyn E. Cook, BA,
- Rachel J. Topazian,
- Luke A. Mueller, BA,
- Paul S. Mueller, MD, MPH and
- Keith M. Swetz, MD, MA
+ Author Affiliations
- Correspondence to Keith M. Swetz, MD, MA, Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905. E-mail swetz.keith@mayo.edu
Abstract
Background—Patients undergo major physical and psychological changes after implantation of a left ventricular assist device as destination
therapy (DT). We sought to qualitatively study outcomes and attitudes of patients after DT.
Methods and Results—Ambulatory
outpatients with DT at our institution were invited to be interviewed
between June and August 2011. In-person interviews
were audio-recorded, transcribed, and
analyzed qualitatively using thematic analysis. The study included 12
patients (11 men)
from the Midwestern United States with a
median age of 71.5 years (range, 33–78 years). Interviews were conducted
at a median
(range) time of 1.37 (0.43–5.04) years after
DT implantation. Most patients were white (n=11), married (n=10), and
Christian
(n=10). We identified 6 themes commonly
discussed by the interviewees: preparedness planning, new lease on life,
optimizing
support networks, systemic limitations,
reflections on time, and communication matters. Analysis revealed that
most patients
saw DT as their only choice, despite other
alternatives.
Conclusions—Ambulatory
patients reported varied experiences after DT but commonly reported
gratitude for improved functional status and
a perception of improved symptom burden.
Recommendations for improving post-DT care include developing patient
support systems,
systematizing education for community
providers, and expanding respite services.
Key Words:
- Received October 8, 2013.
- Accepted February 10, 2014.
- © 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.
No comments:
Post a Comment