International law and controlled opioid medicines
Dr Katherine Irene Pettus, PhD, Advocacy Officer, Human Rights and Palliative Care, International Association for Hospice and Palliative Care, reports on the fifth intersessional meeting of the Commission on Narcotic Drugs.
As Advocacy Officer for International Association for Hospice and
Palliative Care (IAHPC), I attend meetings of the Commission on Narcotic
Drugs (CND), a UN treaty body, with other civil society organisations
concerned with health and human rights. Our goal is to shift CND’s
historical emphasis from excessive control and enforcement of illicit
drugs, to improved availability of opioid medicines for the relief of
pain and suffering. On 4 September, I attended an intersessional meeting
in Vienna.
The purpose of this meeting was to prepare delegates of CND member
states for 2016 UNGASS (United Nations General Assembly Special Session
on Drugs). The afternoon session featured a brief panel to educate
delegates on the issue of availability of essential opioid medicines
controlled under international law. Presentations were given by
representatives from the International Narcotics Control Board, INCB,
(Dr Stefano Berterame), World Health Organization, WHO, (Dr Gilles
Forte), and United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, UNODC, (Dr
Gilberto Gerra). Links to all three presentations, which include
detailed statistics, graphics and references, are available on the UNODC
website Special Session of the General Assembly UNGASS 2016.
Although the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs mandates states parties to ensure adequate access
to the opioid medicines “scheduled” under its provisions, more than 80%
of the world’s people live in countries where access to those medicines
is “low to inadequate.” This situation represents a human rights
violation of global proportions, a “global pandemic of untreated pain”
in the words of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
While those of us who have been working on improving availability
welcome increased attention to the issue, it was disappointing that
there was still so much narrative emphasis on control and misuse rather
than access, particularly from Dr Berterame. Dr Gerra of UNODC did his
best to set the stage for a more comprehensive approach, saying that
“Access to medicines is 50% of the mandate of the drug control system –
it cannot just be relegated to a sub-point under the theme of ‘drugs and
health’.”
The US, Netherlands, Norway and Spain all commented on the fact that
CND must do better to improve the situation to conform to the mandates
of the treaties. Dr Forte, Coordinator of Medicines Policy at the WHO,
presented Scholten and Duthey’s powerful data, as well as the results of
the ATOME (Access to Opioid Medication in Europe) project, and the
Australia/UICC initiative (see link below for Dr Forte’s presentation).
Now, the work is to follow up to ensure that CND delegates integrate
this essential educational piece into their policy agendas for the 2016
UNGASS.
No comments:
Post a Comment