Clinical and Genetic Factors Related to Cancer-Induced Bone Pain and Bone Pain Relief
+ Author Affiliations
- Correspondence: Marco Maltoni, M.D., Palliative Care Clinic, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori IRCCS, Via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014 Meldola (FC), Italy. Telephone: 39 0543 733332; E-Mail: ma.maltoni@ausl.fo.it malto.ma@tin.it
Abstract
Objective. The study
objective was to evaluate whether there are clinical or genetic
differences between patients with cancer-induced
bone pain (CIBP) and patients with non-CIBP,
and, in the CIBP group, in those with good versus poor opioid response.
Materials and Methods.
A total of 2,294 adult patients with cancer who were receiving opioids
for moderate or severe pain were included in the European
Pharmacogenetic Opioid Study. Pain intensity and
pain relief were measured using the Brief Pain Inventory. Linkage
disequilibrium
of 112 single nucleotide polymorphisms was
evaluated in 25 candidate genes, and 43 haplotypes were assessed.
Correlations
among demographical factors, disease-related
factors, genetic factors, CIBP, and pain relief were analyzed by
logistic regression
models corrected for multiple testing. Patients
with bone metastases and bone/soft tissue pain were defined as having
prevalent
bone pain (CIBP population). This population was
compared with patients who had other types of cancer pain (non-CIBP).
Results. A total of 577 patients (26.2%) had CIBP, and 1,624 patients (73.8%) had non-CIBP. Patients with CIBP had more breakthrough
cancer pain episodes (64.2% vs. 56.4%, p = .001), had significantly higher pain interference in “walking ability in the past 24 hours” (p < .0001), used more adjuvant drugs (84.1% vs. 78.3%, p = .003), and had a higher, albeit nonsignificant, median overall survival (3.8 vs. 2.9 months, p = .716) than patients with non-CIBP. None of the examined haplotypes exceeded p values corrected for multiple testing for the investigated outcomes.
Conclusion. Patients
with CIBP who were taking opioids had a clinical profile slightly
different from that of the non-CIBP group. However,
no specific genetic pattern emerged for CIBP
versus non-CIBP and for responsive versus nonresponsive patients with
CIBP.
No comments:
Post a Comment