Use of midazolam in hospitalized patients: analysis of medical practice.
Bull Cancer. 2013 Sep 1;100(9):811-817.
Source
CHU de Grenoble, unité de médecine palliative, 38043 Grenoble cedex 9, France.Abstract
To
evaluate the prevalence and the characteristics of use of midazolam
among hospitalized patients and to analyze physicians' representation of
this medicine. We conducted a retrospective study between 1st May and
22nd May 2011 in Grenoble University Hospital in France. All patients
receiving midazolam during the study period were included, excepted if
the prescription was performed in intensive care units, operating rooms
or in pediatric units. Physicians from the different units were asked
about the characteristics of patients receiving midazolam and about
their practice concerning the use of midazolam. Forty-four patients were
included, 82 % of whom having a cancer. The prevalence of prescription
of midazolam was 3.3 % (44/1,323), 2.8 % (37/1,323) for anxiety
relieving and 0.8 % (11/1,323) for sedation.
The main refractory symptoms that justified the prescription were
dyspnea (36.4 %), confusion (29.5 %), pain (27.3 %) and psychological
suffering (27.3 %). Twenty-eight physicians were asked about their
practice. The main representations of midazolam were the stop of active
treatment (46.5 %) and premature cause of death (46.5 %).
Practice of sedation is under-estimated by physicians as they have difficulties to differentiate anxiety relieving and sedation and they have difficulties to initiate a sedation. A guideline to help physicians using midazolam could improve practice.
Practice of sedation is under-estimated by physicians as they have difficulties to differentiate anxiety relieving and sedation and they have difficulties to initiate a sedation. A guideline to help physicians using midazolam could improve practice.
No comments:
Post a Comment