Translate

Friday, February 20, 2015


Palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases from lung cancer: Evidence-based medicine?

 2014 Dec 10;5(5):845-57. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i5.845.

Abstract

To review current recommendations for palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases secondary to lung cancer, and to analyze surveys to examine whether global practice is evidence-based, English language publications related to best practice palliative external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for bone metastases (BM) from lung cancer were sought via literature search (2003-2013). Additional clinical practice guidelines and consensus documents were obtained from the online Standards and Guidelines Evidence Directory. Eligible survey studies contained hypothetical case scenarios which required participants to declare whether or not they would administer palliative EBRT and if so, to specify what dose fractionation schedule they would use. 
There is no convincing evidence of differential outcomes based on histology or for spine vs non-spine uncomplicated BM. For uncomplicated BM, 8Gy/1 is widely recommended as current best practice; this schedule would be used by up to 39.6% of respondents to treat a painful spinal lesion. Either 8Gy/1 or 20Gy/5 could be considered standard palliative RT for BM-related neuropathic pain; 0%-13.2% would use the former and 5.8%-52.8% of respondents the latter (range 3Gy/1-45Gy/18). 
A multifraction schedule is the approach of choice for irradiation of impending pathologic fracture or spinal cord compression and 54% would use either 20Gy/5 or 30Gy/10.
 Survey results regarding management of complicated and uncomplicated BM secondary to lung cancer continue to show a large discrepancy between published literature and patterns of practice.

No comments:

Post a Comment