Antiemetic therapy in Asia Pacific countries for patients receiving moderately and highly emetogenic chemotherapy—a descriptive analysis of practice patterns, antiemetic quality of care, and use of antiemetic guidelines
Abstract
Purpose
This
paper reports prescribing patterns for prophylaxis of
chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) after highly or
moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC or MEC) for cancer in six Asia
Pacific countries.
Methods
In
a prospective noninterventional study, 31 sites in Australia, China,
India, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan recorded details of CINV
prophylaxis for the acute phase (first 24 h) and delayed phase (days
2–5) after single-day HEC or MEC for adult patients. Additional
information on CINV prophylactic medications was collected from 6-day
patient diaries. Primary antiemetic therapies were defined as
corticosteroids, the 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonists
(5HT3-RAs), and neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists (NK1-RAs).
Results
Evaluable
patients in cycle 1 numbered 648 (318 [49 %] HEC and 330 [51 %] MEC) of
mean (SD) age of 56 (12) years, including 58 % women.
For the acute
phase after HEC, overall (and country range), 96 % (91–100 %) of
patients received a 5HT3-RA, 87 % (70–100 %) a corticosteroid, and 43 %
(0–91 %) an NK1-RA.
CINV prophylaxis for the HEC delayed phase was more
variable: including 22 % (7–65 %) 5HT3-RA, 52 % (12–93 %)
corticosteroid, and 46 % (0–88 %) NK1-RA.
For the MEC acute phase, 97 %
(87–100 %) of patients received 5HT3-RA and 86 % (73–97 %) a
corticosteroid.
For the MEC delayed phase, 201 patients (61 %) received a
primary antiemetic, including 5HT3-RA (41 %), corticosteroid (37 %),
and/or NK1-RA (4 %).
Conclusions
The
5HT3-RAs were prescribed consistently in all countries, while
prescribing of other antiemetic therapies was variable, and
corticosteroids were under-prescribed for CINV prophylaxis, particularly
in the delayed phase.
No comments:
Post a Comment