Translate

Friday, May 31, 2013

Nurse-Led End-of-Life Talks


Workshop Encourages Nurse-Led End-of-Life Talks
Pam Harrison
May 24, 2013






Log on and learn critical leadership skills needed to enhance your nursing career.


Information from Industry


A community-based workshop led by nurses is inspiring people to make end-of-life plans with loved ones.
"There are a lot of people who still have misunderstandings about the need for advanced directives so we felt it was important to offer this workshop to the community before they or their family members or loved ones get sick," Katherine Hinderer, PhD, RN, from Salisbury University, in Maryland, told Medscape Medical News.
"Almost all of them indicated that the workshop increased their understanding of advanced directives," she said.
Older people were much more likely to prepare such a plan, Dr. Hinderer added. "I guess those of us who are young are often resistant to talk about these issues."
The work, presented at the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses 2013 National Teaching Institute and Critical Care Exposition, in Boston, Massachusetts, included 81 people.
Dr. Hinderer and research student Patty Rubins, RN, also at Baltimore University at the time, developed, implemented, and explored whether or not a community-based workshop would encourage more planning.

In critical care settings across America, patients are so ill that they are not able to make their own decisions.

"I also invited members from interdisciplinary teams to offer presentations on some of the legal and medical terms that are on an advanced directive form because these terms can be very challenging to understand," Dr. Hinderer explained.
For example, people do not necessarily know what "life-sustaining therapy" means. Nor do they really understand "withdrawal of support." Yet both of these terms are on the advanced directive form they must complete.
After the workshop, Dr Hinderer asked people to complete a survey about the likelihood that they would complete an advanced directive themselves or whether they would talk about an advanced directive with loved ones. The survey response rate was 86%.
More than 91% of participants who completed the survey said they would complete a plan and talk to a loved one about it.
"One of the important things about advanced directives is the communication piece," Dr. Hinderer said. It's not just filling out the form, she explained, but talking to family members and loved ones about what they themselves would want to happen in an end-of-life situation when they are not able to talk for themselves.
Share Stories
"Our society is so death-denying," she added. "Yet in my experience, a lot of older adults are very happy to talk about death. So I think with some simple planning and connecting with key stakeholders in advanced care planning, it is relatively easy to plan a workshop in the community and give people a chance to share stories about how families suffer when they have to make decisions for their loved ones when they really don't know what the loved one wants."
Log on and learn critical leadership skills needed to enhance your nursing career.


Information from Industry
Asked by Medscape Medical News to comment on this work, Debra Wiegand, PhD, RN, from the University of Maryland School of Nursing, in Baltimore, said she felt that Dr. Hinderer's work is extremely important because only 20% to 25% of Americans have advanced directives.
"In critical care settings across America, the majority of patients are so ill that they are not able to make their own decisions," she explained. "So, the health care team turns to each patient's surrogate to make decisions on each patient's behalf and most families haven't had these important end-of-life discussions."
Dr. Wiegand said, "These discussions are so important because nurses and physicians are able to honor patient wishes and help families as these decisions are made."
Dr. Hinderer and Dr. Wiegand have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN) 2013 National Teaching Institute and Critical Care Exposition: Abstract C30M272. Presented May 22, 2013


First Man Has Prostatectomy Because of BRCA Gene Mutation


First Man Has Prostatectomy Because of BRCA Gene Mutation
Zosia Chustecka
May 21, 2013

    




UPDATED May 21, 2013 — The first man has undergone prostatectomy after finding that out that he carries the BRCA2 gene mutation.
BRCA gene mutations increase the risk for a number of cancers, including prostate cancer. They were in the news last week after superstar Angelina Jolie announced that she had a prophylactic mastectomy to avoid breast cancer.
Hot on the heels of that extensive media coverage, news of the first prophylactic prostatectomy because of the genetic mutation made the front page of the Sunday Times.
The surgery was performed by Roger Kirby, MD, director of the Prostate Cancer Center in London, United Kingdom, an eminent prostate cancer specialist who has performed more than 2000 prostatectomies. Ironically, he himself recently underwent radical prostatectomy after prostate cancer was found.
The man who underwent surgery was participating in a clinical trial, conducted by the Institute of Cancer Research (ICR), that involved more than 20,000 men. Previous results from this trial have shown that a man with a BRCA2 mutation has an 8.6-fold increased risk of developing prostate cancer, and with a BRCA1 mutation has a 3.4-fold increased risk. Just weeks ago, the ICR researchers reported that prostate cancer in men with the BRCA2 mutation is more aggressive and more likely to be fatal (J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:1748-1757).
"Knowing you are a carrier is like having the sword of Damocles hanging over you," Dr. Kirby said in an interview with the Sunday Times. "You are living in a state of constant fear. I am sure more male BRCA carriers will follow suit."
The man who underwent the surgery is described as a 53-years-old businessman from London who is married with children and has several family members who have had breast or prostate cancer. When he found out he was carrying the BRCA2 mutation, he asked to have his prostate removed.
Initially, the ICR researchers were reluctant, the newspaper reports, because there was no indication of a problem, either from prostate-specific antigen tests or from a magnetic resonance imaging scan. However, a biopsy showed microscopic malignant changes.
Even then, however, Dr. Kirby said he would not have operated if the man had not been identified as a carrierof the BRCA2 gene mutation.
"The relatively low level of cancerous cells we found in this man's prostate before the operation should, these days, not prompt immediate surgery to remove the gland, but given what we now know about the nature of BRCA2, it was definitely the right thing to do for this patient," he told the newspaper.
BRCA2 Prostate Cancer Aggressive and Lethal
When the results of the ICR study showing that prostate cancer in men with BRCA2 mutations is both aggressive and lethal were first published, senior author Ros Eeles, MBBS, PhD, professor of oncogenetics at the ICR and honorary consultant in clinical oncology at The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust in Surrey, United Kingdom, said that "it is clear from our study that prostate cancers linked to inheritance of the BRCA2 cancer gene are more deadly than other types."
"It must make sense to start offering affected men immediate surgery or radiotherapy, even for early-stage cases that would otherwise be classified as low risk. We won't be able to tell for certain that earlier treatment can benefit men with inherited cancer genes until we've tested it in a clinical trial, but the hope is that our study will ultimately save lives by directing treatment at those who most need it," she said in an ICR statement.
The ICR research team examined the medical records of 61 carriers of the BRCA2 mutation, 18 carriers of the BRCA1 mutation, and 1940 noncarriers.
They found that BRCA1/2 mutation carriers were more likely than noncarriers to be diagnosed with advanced-stage prostate cancer (37% vs 28%) or cancer that had already spread (18% vs 9%). For those whose cancers had not spread past the prostate at diagnosis, more carriers than noncarriers had metastatic disease within 5 years (23% vs 7%).
Patients with BRCA2 mutations were also significantly less likely to survive the cancer; survival was significantly shorter in carriers of the mutation than noncarriers (6.5 vs 12.9 years). The researchers conclude that a BRCA2 test could be used in combination with other factors as a prognostic test.
Men with a BRCA1 mutation also had a shorter average survival time (10.5 years), but it was not significantly different from noncarriers.
Alan Ashworth, PhD, chief executive of ICR, explained that testing for the BRCA2 gene has "offered families with an inherited risk for prostate or breast cancer the chance for close monitoring, earlier diagnosis, and preventative management. Our knowledge of cancer genetics is now increasingly shaping the way we treat the disease, by allowing us to offer more intensive treatment, or even different drugs altogether, for people who have inherited cancer genes."
Julie Sharp, MD, senior science information manager at Cancer Research UK, noted that "this study shows that doctors need to consider treating men with prostate cancer and a faulty BRCA2 gene much sooner than they currently do, rather than waiting to see how the disease develops. We've known that men who inherit a faulty BRCA2 gene are at greater risk of developing prostate cancer, but this is the largest study to show that the faulty gene also makes the disease more likely to develop quickly and spread."
Decision Based on Emotion, Not Data
"The issue of performing a so-called prophylactic prostatectomy because the man is a carrier of the BRCA gene raises many complexities," said Marc Garnick, MD, clinical professor of medicine at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, Massachusetts. Dr. Garnick, who is editor-in-chief of the Harvard Annual Report on Prostate Diseases, was approached for comment by Medscape Medical News.
According to the news report, this man "had actual evidence of prostate cancer, as determined by the presence of malignant cells in his prostate gland.... This is not necessarily comparable to a woman without any evidence of cancer — just a heightened risk of developing cancer — selecting prophylactic mastectomy because she is a BRCA gene carrier," Dr. Garnick pointed out.
This patient is totally representative of the population of men who would have undergone radical prostatectomy in the past, he explained. "However, recent controversies about the harm resulting from these procedures performed on men with otherwise only microscopic cancers has brought this practice into sharper focus."
The recent ICR results suggesting that male BRCA carriers who have prostate cancer have more aggressive cancers is "of interest, but preliminary, and worthy of additional study," Dr. Garnick noted.

Prophylactic radical prostatectomy...is based predominantly on emotions, not data. Dr. Marc Garnick


"The real unanswered question relates to whether our current interventions, if applied to this group of men with aggressive cancers, either with or without BRCA mutations, will ultimately have a positive impact on the course of the disease. Pessimistically, most of the level 1 data suggest this not the case, but the potential association between BRCA with more aggressive prostate cancers provides a fertile ground for appropriately conducted clinical research to help answer the question for the patients we serve," Dr. Garnick explained.
"Currently, a man's decision to undergo a prophylactic radical prostatectomy because he is carrying the BRCA gene is based predominantly on emotions, not data. Medical science is charged with determining if this is ultimately the right thing to do, and only appropriately conducted clinical research can answer this question," he said. 

What's New in the Management of Blood Clots for Cancer Patients


Palliative Medicine - Nurses Visit to Cancer patients at Home


Palliat Med. 2013 Apr;27(4):349-57. 
Early support visits by district nurses to cancer patients at home: a multi-perspective qualitative study.
Source
University of Manchester, School of Nursing Midwifery and Social Work, Manchester, UK. jane.griffiths@manchester.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Many palliative cancer patients spend much of their last year at home. In the UK, district nurses make frequent support visits to patients and carers at this time, yet surprisingly little is known about their supportive role in palliative care. Current studies are limited to district nurses' reports of practice, which offer limited insight into their content. Patients' and carers' views on district nurse support visits are largely unknown.
AIM:
To present findings of a multi-perspective study that explored how district nurse early support visits are both described and carried out.
DESIGN:
Focus groups with district nurses to explore views on the purpose of early support visits. Observation of support visits to identify how they are conducted. Patient and carer interviews to elucidate and verify district nurse data.
SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS:
Participants included 58 district nurses, 10 palliative care patients and nine carers from four Primary Care Trusts in contrasting urban and rural locations.
RESULTS:
District nurses had difficulty articulating early support visits. Observations however revealed a complex role comprising extensive physical and practical assessments, practical interventions, information giving, liaison, facilitation and referral. Patients and carers confirmed that they felt valued, reassured and supported by district nurses.
CONCLUSIONS:
A multi-perspective approach provided new insights into district nurse support visits. Monitoring work described appears to have additional psycho-social benefits for patients and carers. The supportive role of district nurses needs to be clearly articulated and recognised so that colleagues, patients and carers access this valuable resource for palliative care patients.

'Busyness' and the preclusion of quality palliative district nursing care


Nurs Ethics. 2013 May 23. 
'Busyness' and the preclusion of quality palliative district nursing care.
Source
University of Manchester, UK.
Abstract
Ethical care is beginning to be recognised as care that accounts for the views of those at the receiving end of care. However, in the context of palliative and supportive district nursing care, the patients' and their carers' views are seldom heard. This qualitative research study explores these views. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 26 patients with palliative and supportive care needs receiving district nursing care, and 13 of their carers. Participants were recruited via community nurses and hospices between September 2010 and October 2011. Post-structural discourse analysis is used to examine how discourses operate on a moral level. One discourse, 'busyness', is argued to preclude a moral form of nursing care. The discourse of friendship is presented to contrast this. 

Discussion explores Gallagher's 'slow ethics' and challenges the currently accepted ways of measuring to improve quality of care concluding that quality cannot be measured